Beth's Blog::
Recruiting Kids behind parent's backs |
 | By beth
Executive Editor
Published: Sat Sep 30, 2006 9:10 pm
|
|
So here's the scenario:
Your teenage son or daughter goes off for another day at high-school. They leave for school, you go to work, and then you both come home. It's at this point your child informs you they've spoken to a recruiter and have signed themselves up for the military. You've never talked about it with your kids, and not a hint of speculation would have suggested your child was interested in joining America's finest.
It's at this point you press the issue and find your child isn't too secure about their choice either, but the recruiting officer at your child's high school used high-pressure tactics, including a guilt trip about not putting financial stress on the rest of their family to pay for education.
So the kid is locked in, has to go off to war. Comes home in a body bag, all because of a misguided choice and a recruiting officer having to fill his quota.
This is the scenario that played out on CNN earlier today, and it's one of the more popular high conflict debates in America right now.
Personally (my kids are only 4 & 2) I'd rip the recruiters neck off with my own two hands if this happened to me. I understand my children will be able to make their own decisions one day, but they should not be allowed to make that decision in schools without speaking with their parents. Absolutely not. |
|
 | By Matt
The Voice of Reason and Dissension
Published: Sat Sep 30, 2006 11:35 pm
|
|
that's a bunch a crap.
Recruits have opportunities to get out of the contracts. The recruiter will of course use pressure to say otherwise.
18 is still the age of consent. Even if a child signs up and raises his/her hand, long as they are under 18, parents or guardian have to sign off.
So this portrail of the military coming and snatching kids is just wrong.
And shouldn't the conversation about what the child wants to do with their lives have taken place long before they were 18? I mean not an exact map but at least some sort of idea of what your kid is thinking? _________________ Procrastinate now, don't wait until later. |
|
 | By RebelSnake
Features Reporter
Published: Sun Oct 01, 2006 8:19 am
|
|
I have to agree with Matt on this one. When I joined the Navy back in '74 I was seventeen and a half and had to have my parents signatures to do so. Like Matt said, eighteen is still the age of consent and kids still need parental consent to do certain things. _________________ Carl Sagan:
"I don't want to beLIEve. I want to know." |
|
| By meblogin
Guest Columnist
Published: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:03 am
|
|
Beth,
I see your point and in those times where the parent is uninformed it would be very hard to not get upset. _________________ Have a fantastic day!
meblogin
http://meblogin.blogspot.com/ |
|
| By joelgillespie
Guest Columnist
Published: Mon Oct 02, 2006 12:30 pm
|
|
Beth,
I agrew with you, and that would certainly make me angry as a parent. It also makes me angry that they can do physcological counseling/testing with your child and not tell you, and escort your child to an abortion clinic without telling you. It is as if in our culture the State or the School wants to replace the parent. I think all of these intrusions are wrong.
Joel _________________ Joel Gillespie |
|
 | By Matt
The Voice of Reason and Dissension
Published: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:21 pm
|
|
meblogin wrote:
Beth,
I see your point and in those times where the parent is uninformed it would be very hard to not get upset.
That's a relationship issue between parent and child. You can't blame the military for that. |
|
 | By beth
Executive Editor
Published: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:40 pm
|
|
Matt wrote:
That's a relationship issue between parent and child. You can't blame the military for that.
You anticipate your child is going to school to learn something and get an education. Wasting your child's time trying to high pressure them into the military should not be a requirement. But that's the problem isn't it. If the government left it up to parents to talk with their children, and drive them over to the recruiting office if they so choose to discuss the issue, no one would go. Why do we see recruiting officers in highschools, and malls? Because all they care about is putting a body behind the gun. They need to do it like they have prior to this "near draft" of recruiting that's popped up lately. Put a table up during lunch, talk to those are interested, and before anythings signed: Say "Bring your mom or dad down to my office and will discussing signing the papers." Is that really all that hard? |
|
| By melalyssa
Guest Columnist
Published: Mon Oct 02, 2006 1:49 pm
|
|
On 20/20 or one of those shows they went "undercover" and showed recruiters in front of a south carolina walmart speaking to young black men, they were targeting the poor areas of town and really promising these kids the moon to sign up. _________________ Moving to G'boro ASAP! |
|
 | By Matt
The Voice of Reason and Dissension
Published: Mon Oct 02, 2006 2:19 pm
|
|
beth wrote:
You anticipate your child is going to school to learn something and get an education. Wasting your child's time trying to high pressure them into the military should not be a requirement. But that's the problem isn't it. If the government left it up to parents to talk with their children, and drive them over to the recruiting office if they so choose to discuss the issue, no one would go. Why do we see recruiting officers in highschools, and malls? Because all they care about is putting a body behind the gun. They need to do it like they have prior to this "near draft" of recruiting that's popped up lately. Put a table up during lunch, talk to those are interested, and before anythings signed: Say "Bring your mom or dad down to my office and will discussing signing the papers." Is that really all that hard?
But the parents still have to sign off on it if they are under 18. No mater what the recruit signs or raises his/her hand to, if they are under 18, they don't go without the parent signing off on it.
I'm not sure where you get the idea a child under 18 can commit to anything without the parents knowing or approving. |
|
|
|