·  News ·  Travel ·  Food ·  Arts ·  Science ·  Sports ·  Advice ·  Religion ·  Life ·  Greensboro · 

Book review: "Glory Road"

by SouthernFriedInfidel | Published on October 12th, 2007, 7:46 am | Arts
[amazon]I'll[/amazon] say right up front that I have been a fan of Robert Heinlein for most of my life. When I was a kid, I loved reading his "juvenile" novels like "Space Cadet," "Tunnel in the Sky" and "Citizen of the Galaxy." Later, I discovered his more adult-level works of science fiction were far better. "Stranger in a Strange Land," "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" and "Starship Troopers" are among the finest novels ever made for the genre.

So I was intrigued when I discovered that he had, shortly after publishing "Stranger," gone in for a sword-and-sorcery fantasy novel called "Glory Road." Considering the quality of his science fiction, I thought he had the talent to make a great entry in the "other side" of the speculative fiction field. Sadly, this is not the case. This book was his only entry in the field, and there are good reasons why he never tried it again.

The story starts out in the jungles of the early Vietnam War. The hero is a volunteer who went to the war early on in order to avoid being drafted. After doing his stint and making his way to Europe to recover from injuries sustained in the fighting, he is approached by a beautiful woman who needs the help of an expert fighter for a quest in other worlds. He signs on and gets sucked into a bizarre set of adventures across several universes.

The problem with the story is that Heinlein wants to make it a fantasy story, but he can't really bring himself to leave his science-fiction habits behind. Magic has to be explained in some sort of science-sounding terms. The biology of dragons has to be described in detail. It really looks like the man was uncomfortable in the writing of this adventure.

All of that might have been forgivable if the reason for adventure had been explained, for one thing. All through the story, we are dragged through several worlds, facing strange dangers that turn out to have been more dangerous than they appear only after being overcome. The reader has no idea what the possible consequence of failure is at any given time, so there's far less sense of suspense than any of the scenes could have had. Still, all that could have been gotten past, considering that the writing was decent and scenes varied. Character development in the first 2/3 of the book went along nicely for the most part.

But what is unforgivable in this book is that the adventures ended after the 2/3 mark. The quest was achieved, and the heroes all settled down to a cushy life of enjoying the fruits of their labors. For pretty much the last third of the book nothing happens except for the hero struggling with the boredom of living in paradise and not having to lift a finger for anything he wants. Hardly stuff to keep one interested, particularly when the reader is holding a book with 70 or so pages in his right hand.

All I can really say about this book is that it's not one of Heinlein's better known works, and it's best that it stay that way. Oy vey!
 
 
Maybe he's never heard of suspension of disbelief.
October 12th, 2007, 8:46 am
User avatar
Liv
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
 
Location: Greensboro, NC
Liv wrote:Maybe he's never heard of suspension of disbelief.

Oh, he was a great writer... but even the best are capable of stumbling. Even the Beatles should never have made "Why Don't We Do It In the Road?" :lol:
October 12th, 2007, 8:58 am
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.
I thought he went downhill quickly after Stranger in a Strange Land. The last book of his I really enjoyed was "Friday"
All stupid ideas pass through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is ridiculed. Third, it is ridiculed
October 12th, 2007, 2:51 pm
User avatar
A Person
 
Location: Slightly west of the Great White North
A Person wrote:I thought he went downhill quickly after Stranger in a Strange Land. The last book of his I really enjoyed was "Friday"

When I had a writing class with Orson Scott Card -- many years ago -- he said that Heinlein had ended his days thinking that he was God. Reading The Cat Who Walks Through Walls sure gave me that impression.

Job: A Comedy of Justice was decent, I guess. But my favorites so far have been Stranger, Starship Troopers and Moon is a Harsh Mistress.
October 12th, 2007, 2:59 pm
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.
Nah I just think he was a cynical bugger, like Jubal Harshaw (a self-caricature), who realized he could rest on his reputation and sell books no matter what the content.
October 12th, 2007, 4:46 pm
User avatar
A Person
 
Location: Slightly west of the Great White North
A Person wrote:Nah I just think he was a cynical bugger, like Jubal Harshaw (a self-caricature), who realized he could rest on his reputation and sell books no matter what the content.

I have to agree with you there. Shame really.

BTW, terrific new sig. I really enjoyed reading Smith's story a couple of years ago. Cool stuff, geology...
October 12th, 2007, 4:49 pm
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.
His book "Strata, Identified by Organised Fossils" is on-line in facsimile format. It's a bit dry but it is so very important as key stage in our understanding of the Earth. This was one of the key discoveries that led to the realisation that the Earth had to be far older than Usher imagined and which all the 'Flood Geology" models still fail miserably to explain. And as he says, it's easy to understand - provided you are prepared to look at the evidence (which is still there to be seen). Yet another example where examining the evidence with an open, rational mind resulted in a paradigm (worldview) change.

It's denying this that gets me so annoyed with the Creationist camp. They want to take us back to the science of the pre-enlightenment days of the 1700's and in the process lie and malign intelligent and honest men who made a real contribution to knowledge. And then they smugly assert that they are being open minded by considering the Bible as the only legitimate source of knowledge.

Sorry, rant over :)
October 12th, 2007, 5:11 pm
User avatar
A Person
 
Location: Slightly west of the Great White North
SouthernFriedInfidel wrote:Oh, he was a great writer... but even the best are capable of stumbling. Even the Beatles should never have made "Why Don't We Do It In the Road?" :lol:


No one will be watching us...
October 12th, 2007, 7:07 pm
User avatar
Nfidel
 
So I was intrigued when I discovered that he had, shortly after publishing "Stranger," gone in for a sword-and-sorcery fantasy novel called "Glory Road."


I've not heard of this book until now. Thanks for the review. I don't like fantasy that much. I have read several things about Heinlein that talk about him losing his creativity. I like much of what I have read by him, though. Time Enough For Love really took some bizarre turns (that MF'er). Reading Farnham's Freehold I was uncomfortable by the black race of the future enslaving white girls and such. Didn't they eat babies also? I don't know if he was racist or just had a bad idea and ran with it.

One of my favorite writers is Larry Niven. He's a sci fi author who has written quite a few fantasy novels, but I just couldn't get interested in them. His A Mote In God's Eye is one of the best first contact novels I've read.
October 12th, 2007, 7:21 pm
User avatar
Nfidel
 

Return to Arts