Now, I understand the notion of banning the courts from considering religious laws in deciding court cases. Myself, I have to wonder how big a problem this had become in Oklahoma courts, that someone thought they needed to amend their constitution to prevent it. But adding INTERNATIONAL laws into that mix sure speaks volumes about the state of political thought out there.
That's pretty far into the heart of Farright Town thinking, I expect. And it really ought to be tossed out without much of a fight at the federal level, I should think. After all, international laws consist of legally binding treaties that the United States has signed onto. I would expect that banning their consideration by a state in its courts should be deemed unconstitutional. Seems that the Oklahoma nutbars have pushed the envelope a bit farther than they really ought to have. They used people's fears of Islam to fool them into giving them something they've wanted forever.
Of course, considering it was Oklahoma, perhaps they weren't actually in fact "fooled."