Stem Cells From Skin
|
|
by
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
Published on November 20th, 2007, 4:50 pm Rift: Sciences |
Or that's how they're spinning it.
But I don't see how those who had ethical hang-ups about embryo stem-cells, aren't calling foul on the skin stem cells. Certainly "any" cell could result in life. I could clone your ugly aunt Jo who is hump back, and toothless... with modern cloning techniques, (eg. Dolly) yet... the fact that some goo that could "become" life is destroyed is ethically wrong?
So then comes along this:
Their breakthroughs could make possible the long-sought goal of tailor-made medicine, but without the political, scientific and ethical roadblock of using human embryos.
Both teams call the new cells induced pluripotent stem cells and say they look and act like embryonic stem cells -- the master cells that give rise to every cell and tissue in the body.
"We can now envisage a time when a simple approach can be used to produce stem cells that are able to form any tissue from a small sample taken from any of us," Ian Wilmut of the Scottish Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Edinburgh, said in a statement.
Let's not forget about a week ago, they started sucking stem cells from our closest relative in the evolutionary spectrum, the 3 eyed anteater....
Apes, or Skin, it's apparent there is now a work around. George Bush is taking credit, and still Scientists can't make a freaking Hardee's burger under 80 grams of fat. The real question is what if we do find the elixir of life, and we truly can regenerate cells? In essence giving some if not all of us the ability to live as long as we want? What then? Certainly we can't "all" keep living? Certainly "that" proves to be a greater moral question than baby goo... but somehow when it comes time, Why do I feel the first to have access to longevity of life because of stem-cell technology will be those who fought it in the beginning?

