·  News ·  Travel ·  Food ·  Arts ·  Sciences ·  Sports ·  Advice ·  Religion ·  Life ·  Greensboro · 

Magma rises 25% faster than previously thought

User avatar
by
Published on January 5th, 2010, 11:36 am
Rift: Sciences
  
ScienceDaily (Jan. 4, 2010) — Scientists have successfully determined the permeability of the asthenosphere in the Earth's upper mantle and thus the rate at which melt rises to the Earth's surface: it flows up to 25 times faster than previously assumed. Thermo-mechanical and geochemical models on melt flows in volcanoes now have to be reconsidered.
...
With such models, the flow behavior of magma melt in the basic tectonic areas of the Earth, such as on mid-ocean ridges upon which new oceanic crust forms, or on volcanically active tectonic plate margins -- so-called subduction zones. For Schmidt, it is therefore clear that the existing models need to be revised in light of the constants now established. The melt that forms at a depth of about 120 kilometers does not need tens to hundreds of thousands of years to reach the Earth's surface as was previously presumed; it only takes a few thousand years. "If a volcano erupts today, its magma did not form during the last ice age, but during the reign of the Pharaohs and around the birth of Christ," states Schmidt

This casts magmatism in a whole new light. Due to the rapid ascent, the melt interacts much less with the rock it penetrates. This means that the geochemical signals that bring the magma to the surface come from far greater depths: "We are looking deeper than previously assumed," says the mineralogist. For the scientist, the rapid ascent also fits better with the fact that volcanoes are only active for a few thousand years and the observation that geochemical signals in the magma suggested a much faster rise until now


Cool. Or at least hot.
January 5th, 2010, 11:36 am   Share
 
I say "Nifty." Gaining more accurate knowledge of the world -- particularly the whole volcano business -- is always a good thing, whether it results in tangible benefits or not.
January 5th, 2010, 12:53 pm
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Posts: 9101
Joined: August 8th, 2006, 11:54 am
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.
I think better undertanding magma flow is very likely to result in tangible benefits.
January 5th, 2010, 1:21 pm
User avatar
A Person
 
Posts: 9429
Joined: November 25th, 2006, 2:30 pm
A Person wrote:I think better undertanding magma flow is very likely to result in tangible benefits.

Probably. Being better able to map and model volcanic activity would save a LOT of trouble, in the long run.
January 5th, 2010, 1:30 pm
User avatar
SouthernFriedInfidel
 
Posts: 9101
Joined: August 8th, 2006, 11:54 am
Location: 5th circle of hell -- actually not very crowded at the moment.
I have absolutely nothing to add to this educational post except I've always wondered how long you feel pain after jumping in a lava pool?
This is our chance to change things, this is our destiny.
January 5th, 2010, 6:15 pm
User avatar
Liv
I show you something fantastic and you find fault.
 
Posts: 10596
Joined: October 5th, 2005, 1:59 pm
Location: Greensboro, NC

Return to Sciences